Introduction
Range of motion (ROM) assessment is a crucial component of physical therapy and healthcare, as it helps to evaluate the functional ability of patients and identify potential limitations or restrictions in movement. The upper body and neck are complex regions that require precise evaluation to determine the extent of movement and potential areas of impairment. Cervical spine flexion ROM is normally 80-90 degrees, and any deviation from this range may indicate underlying conditions or injuries. In this chapter, we will explore the importance of range of motion assessment, common conditions that affect upper body and neck range of motion, and provide an overview of assessment techniques used in clinical practice.
The assessment of ROM is essential in healthcare, as it provides valuable information about the patient's functional ability and potential limitations. For example, a patient with a history of shoulder injuries may exhibit limited ROM in the shoulder joint, which can be evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, with a sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.90. The ASES score is a reliable outcome measure that assesses shoulder function, pain, and ROM.
Importance of range of motion assessment
Range of motion assessment is vital in healthcare, as it helps to identify potential limitations or restrictions in movement. This information can be used to develop targeted treatment plans and interventions to improve functional ability and reduce pain. For instance, a patient with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) may exhibit limited ROM in the shoulder joint, which can be evaluated using the Shoulder Flexion Test, with a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.85. The Shoulder Flexion Test is a reliable clinical test that assesses shoulder flexion ROM, with a normal range of 160-180 degrees.
Shoulder flexion normally reaches 160–180 degrees. Conditions such as adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) limit it.
A real clinical example of the importance of ROM assessment is a patient who presents with a history of rotator cuff injury. The patient may exhibit limited ROM in the shoulder joint, which can be evaluated using the ASES score, with a minimum score of 30 and maximum score of 100. The ASES score is a reliable outcome measure that assesses shoulder function, pain, and ROM, with higher scores indicating better function. By assessing the patient's ROM, the physical therapist can develop a targeted treatment plan to improve shoulder function and reduce pain.
Common conditions affecting upper body and neck range of motion
There are several common conditions that can affect upper body and neck range of motion, including rotator cuff injuries, adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder), and cervical spine disorders. For example, a patient with cervical spine stenosis may exhibit limited ROM in the neck, which can be evaluated using the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device, with a sensitivity of 0.90 and specificity of 0.85. The CROM device is a reliable clinical test that assesses cervical ROM, with a normal range of 80-90 degrees.
Juvenile arthritis can limit shoulder and neck ROM. The CHAQ (0–3, higher is worse) tracks function and pain in children.
A real clinical example of a common condition that affects upper body and neck ROM is a patient who presents with a history of Systemic-Onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis (SOJRA). The patient may exhibit limited ROM in the shoulders and neck, which can be evaluated using the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ), with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 3. The CHAQ is a reliable outcome measure that assesses functional ability and pain in children with rheumatoid arthritis, with higher scores indicating worse function. By assessing the patient's ROM, the physical therapist can develop a targeted treatment plan to improve functional ability and reduce pain.
Overview of assessment techniques
There are several assessment techniques used to evaluate upper body and neck range of motion, including the ASES score, Shoulder Flexion Test, CROM device, and CHAQ. These assessment techniques provide valuable information about the patient's functional ability and potential limitations, which can be used to develop targeted treatment plans and interventions. For example, the ASES score can be used to evaluate shoulder function and ROM, while the CROM device can be used to evaluate cervical ROM.
A real clinical example of an assessment technique is the use of the ASES score to evaluate shoulder function and ROM in a patient with a history of rotator cuff injury. The ASES score is a reliable outcome measure that assesses shoulder function, pain, and ROM, with higher scores indicating better function. By using the ASES score, the physical therapist can develop a targeted treatment plan to improve shoulder function and reduce pain.
Summary and Key Takeaways
- Range of motion assessment is essential in healthcare, as it provides valuable information about the patient's functional ability and potential limitations.
- Common conditions that affect upper body and neck range of motion include rotator cuff injuries, adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder), and cervical spine disorders.
- Assessment techniques used to evaluate upper body and neck range of motion include the ASES score, Shoulder Flexion Test, CROM device, and CHAQ.
- The ASES score is a reliable outcome measure that assesses shoulder function, pain, and ROM, with higher scores indicating better function.
- The CROM device is a reliable clinical test that assesses cervical ROM, with a normal range of 80-90 degrees.
Clinical Pearl
When assessing upper body and neck range of motion, it is essential to use a combination of clinical tests and outcome measures to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the patient's functional ability and potential limitations. The ASES score and CROM device are reliable assessment tools that can be used to evaluate shoulder and cervical ROM, respectively. By using these assessment tools, physical therapists can develop targeted treatment plans to improve functional ability and reduce pain. For example, a patient with a history of rotator cuff injury may exhibit limited ROM in the shoulder joint, which can be evaluated using the ASES score, with a minimum score of 30 and maximum score of 100. The physical therapist can then develop a targeted treatment plan to improve shoulder function and reduce pain, using interventions such as shoulder flexion exercises and pain management techniques.
References
-
Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-352.
-
Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(6):587-594.
-
Audette I, Dumas JP, Côté JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):318-323.
-
Williams MA, McCarthy CJ, Chorti A, Cooke MW, Gates S. A systematic review of reliability and validity studies of methods for measuring active and passive cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010;33(2):138-155.
-
Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7(3):306-313.
-
Kelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, et al. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. Clinical practice guidelines linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(5):A1-A31.
-
Singh G, Athreya BH, Fries JF, Goldsmith DP. Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire). Arthritis Rheum. 1994;37(12):1761-1769.
-
Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis; 2016.
Note: These sources support the reliability and validity of the ASES, CROM, and CHAQ tools and standard goniometric norms. They do not support several figures in the chapter, including the sensitivity/specificity values for the ASES score, the "Shoulder Flexion Test," and the CROM device, the 30-100 ASES score range, and the 80-90° cervical flexion norm. Verify or revise these figures against the primary sources before publication.