Introduction
Pediatric evaluation is a crucial aspect of healthcare that requires a comprehensive understanding of the principles and practices involved. The evaluation of children's physical abilities and functional movements is essential to identify potential issues and develop effective treatment plans. In this chapter, we will introduce the principles of pediatric evaluation, the importance of functional movement analysis, and provide an overview of common pediatric conditions.

Functional movement analysis looks at how a child walks, runs and jumps, alongside muscle strength and flexibility.
The evaluation of pediatric patients involves a range of assessments, including physical examinations, medical histories, and diagnostic tests. A thorough understanding of pediatric anatomy and physiology is essential to accurately interpret the results of these assessments. For example, the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine in children is normally 80-90 degrees, while the ROM of the shoulder joint is approximately 160-180 degrees.
Functional movement analysis is a critical component of pediatric evaluation, as it helps to identify potential issues with movement patterns and muscle function. This analysis involves assessing the child's ability to perform various movements, such as walking, running, and jumping, and evaluating the strength and flexibility of their muscles. The use of grading scales, such as the Manual Muscle Test (MMT) grades, can help to quantify muscle strength and identify areas of weakness.
Principles of pediatric evaluation
The principles of pediatric evaluation involve a comprehensive assessment of the child's physical abilities, medical history, and functional movements. This assessment should include a thorough physical examination, including measurements of joint ROM, muscle strength, and reflexes. The evaluation should also include a review of the child's medical history, including any previous injuries or illnesses.
For example, a 6-year-old child presents with a complaint of difficulty walking. The physical examination reveals a decreased ROM of the hip joint, with a flexion contracture of 20 degrees. The MMT grades for the hip flexor and extensor muscles are 3/5 and 4/5, respectively. The child's medical history reveals a previous diagnosis of cerebral palsy, which is likely contributing to the decreased ROM and muscle weakness.
The sensitivity and specificity of the physical examination in diagnosing pediatric conditions are high, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 85% for the diagnosis of cerebral palsy. The use of diagnostic tests, such as imaging studies and electromyography, can also help to confirm the diagnosis and guide treatment.
Importance of functional movement analysis
Functional movement analysis is essential in pediatric evaluation, as it helps to identify potential issues with movement patterns and muscle function. This analysis involves assessing the child's ability to perform various movements, such as walking, running, and jumping, and evaluating the strength and flexibility of their muscles.

A 10-year-old with difficulty running: analysis showed excessive foot pronation and decreased hip extension.
For example, a 10-year-old child presents with a complaint of difficulty running. The functional movement analysis reveals a abnormal movement pattern, with excessive pronation of the foot and decreased hip extension. The MMT grades for the ankle and hip muscles are 4/5 and 3/5, respectively. The child's VAS score for pain is 6/10, indicating moderate pain with activity.
The use of grading scales, such as the MMT grades, can help to quantify muscle strength and identify areas of weakness. The sensitivity and specificity of functional movement analysis in diagnosing pediatric conditions are high, with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90% for the diagnosis of movement disorders.
Overview of common pediatric conditions
Common pediatric conditions that may be encountered in pediatric evaluation include cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, and orthopedic conditions such as clubfoot and scoliosis. These conditions can affect the child's movement patterns, muscle function, and overall quality of life.
For example, a child with cerebral palsy may present with decreased ROM of the hip and knee joints, as well as muscle weakness and spasticity. The MMT grades for the hip and knee muscles may be 2/5 and 3/5, respectively, indicating significant weakness. The child's VAS score for pain may be 8/10, indicating severe pain with activity.
The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests, such as imaging studies and electromyography, can help to confirm the diagnosis and guide treatment. For example, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI in diagnosing cerebral palsy are 95% and 90%, respectively.
Summary and Key Takeaways
- The principles of pediatric evaluation involve a comprehensive assessment of the child's physical abilities, medical history, and functional movements.
- Functional movement analysis is essential in pediatric evaluation, as it helps to identify potential issues with movement patterns and muscle function.
- Common pediatric conditions that may be encountered in pediatric evaluation include cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, and orthopedic conditions such as clubfoot and scoliosis.
- The use of grading scales, such as the MMT grades, can help to quantify muscle strength and identify areas of weakness.
- The sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests, such as imaging studies and electromyography, can help to confirm the diagnosis and guide treatment.
Clinical Pearl
When evaluating a child with a complaint of difficulty walking, it is essential to assess the ROM of the hip and knee joints, as well as the strength and flexibility of the muscles. The use of grading scales, such as the MMT grades, can help to quantify muscle strength and identify areas of weakness. A thorough review of the child's medical history, including any previous injuries or illnesses, can also help to guide the evaluation and treatment plan. For example, a child with a history of cerebral palsy may require a more comprehensive evaluation, including assessments of cognitive and motor function, to develop an effective treatment plan.
References
-
Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8-14.
-
Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47(8):571-576.
-
Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):897-907.
-
Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-223.
-
Russell DJ, Rosenbaum PL, Cadman DT, Gowland C, Hardy S, Jarvis S. The Gross Motor Function Measure: a means to evaluate the effects of physical therapy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1989;31(3):341-352.
-
Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206-207.
-
Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, Rodgers MM, Romani WA. Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
-
Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN, eds. Physical Therapy for Children. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016.